Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by peterk: webwml/english/News/weekly/2004/01 index.wml
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 04:10:33PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Debian WWW CVS <webmaster@debian.org> [2004-01-08 13:08]:
> > Log message:
> > Rephrased paragraph about meta-gnome2, keeping it out hinders proper GNOME,
> > not the other way around.
>
> Uhm, I am not sure if I understand your correction correctly: Can
> someone please proofread if the correction is in fact correct?
>
> #v+
> <code>meta-gnome2</code> packages. He listed 13 packages that bear one or
> more problems. Each of them is a reason to keep <code>meta-gnome2</code> out
> -of the testing distribution, which is required for proper GNOME in sarge.
> +of the testing distribution, which stops proper GNOME in sarge.
> #v-
>
> From my understanding the old version was more clear. meta-gnome2 is
> required for proper GNOME in sarge.
>
> Oh, I see your misunderstanding: You think the "which" corresponds to
> the keeping out of meta-gnome2, not meta-gnome2 itself. But your change
> doesn't really clear what the which corresponds to.
>
> Can someone please suggest a rephrase to make it clear?
"Each of them is a reason to keep <code>meta-gnome2</code> out of the
testing distribution. That package is required in order to have a
properly working GNOME in sarge."
(Also, you don't really "bear" problems, you simply "have" them.)
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: