[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Assessing the outdatedness of our web site translations



Hi

I run a website for myself. There are some others who help me maintain it
and to keep them in order I have built a staff network module for php-nuke.
It can easily be customised for use on its own. Its wrote entirely in php
and is currently setup to use MySQL, but can be easily changed to use
postgreSQL.

At the moment it includes a task manager, in which someone lists a task/job
to be done, someone accepts it and then completes it once the job is
finished. The jobs once completed and selected by the admin are archived so
there is a log of everything that has been done on the site.

I have been using linux for years, and debian for the past year. I would
like to help out with the site in anyway possible as I feel I have something
to owe to the community.

Regards

Mike


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Karlsson" <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
> To: <debian-www@lists.debian.org>
> Cc: "Debian www" <debian-www@lists.debian.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Assessing the outdatedness of our web site translations
>
>
> > Martin Quinson:
> >
> > > Yeah. I guess you're right. Where do you put the limit then (sorry if
> > > you already said that I fail to remember) ? One year ? Six months ?
> >
> > My initial thought is six months. I think a year is much too long, six
> > months is more reasonable.
> >
> > > And what if the change was just a typo fix in english and the
> > > translators never bothered updating its number?
> >
> > Then they are not paying attention. It's as simple as that. With the
> > current system, there is no way of differentiating between "small" and
> > "big" changes. Also, sometimes typos in English makes the text mean
> > something completely different, so the translators need to e alert and
> > check even the smallest changes for relevancy.
> >
> > > I think this should keep manual, and not automatic...
> >
> > Having to run it manually would probably just make people forget about
> > it. Kind of like with the tidy/validator runs...
> >
> >
> > Gerfried Fuchs:
> >
> > > Especially in webwml it is even a much smaller problem: You can after
> > > a cvs rm always check out the last version and add it back to
> > > reactivate the translation
> >
> > Exactly. The loss is minimal when the translation is later
> > re-activated.
> >
> > --
> > \\//
> > Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
> >   I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
>



Reply to: