[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: status update about packages.debian.org



On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 01:58:30PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 12:53:09AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Hmm, I have to show the difference between "package foo, arch bar does
> > depend on any version of this" and "package foo, arch bar does _not_ depend on
> > this"
> > Currently this is shown by "any version" and "--".
> > Do you think "" and "--" will suffice or have you a suggestion for
> > the second case, too?
> 
> Well, how about explicating the other one (i.e. "doesn't depend on this")?
> Or, well, reorganizing the display so that it only shows those that do
> depend, and omits those that don't, which would seem the most logical choice
> to start with?

I've quickly hacked something together to get a feeling for what you
mean. Please look at 
http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/~frank/packages/test/44bsd-rdist.en.html
and tell me if that's like what you had in mind. 
(It's just a concept, so please no nitpicking.)

Gruesse,
-- 
*** Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> ***
          *** http://www.djpig.de/ ***
see also: - http://www.usta.de/
          - http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/



Reply to: