On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:08:18PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 01:50:37AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: > > Let me briefly outline why lurker has one mailbox per list: > [...] > > For these reasons I consider the new scheme to be superior from a usability > > and robustness stand-point. > > I still don't see why any of those reasons are decidingly important for > our particular list archive, but never mind. It might not be. However, lurker runs in more places than just debian. I consider them decidingly important for the general use of lurker. > Right now the deployment of lurker seems to be stuck on the fact there isn't > a suitable machine[1]. I'll leave you guys (mejo and you) to hash it out > with debian-admin. :) Ok. -- Wesley W. Terpstra <wesley@terpstra.ca>
Attachment:
pgpV0yBz86aHj.pgp
Description: PGP signature