Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by joey: webwml/english/security/2002 dsa-211.wml dsa-2 ...
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 11:45:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 09:31:47AM -0700, Debian WWW CVS wrote:
> > Log message:
> > Added id tag back for my convenience
> Is it just me who doesn't see any sense in this?
> Forcing N translators to do three version bumps for something like this fits
> my definition of wasting time very nicely.
True to some extent.
If question is: "Do we need to edit these trivial points while asking
translators to fis it, I say do not.
If question is: "Do we need to fix it provided we do not cause trouble to
anyone. YES"
So real question is "Is there any easy way to make minor errata while
making translator (or translatate contents) to stay un-broken? If we
have good method, why no fiz them."
Osamu
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
: :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
`. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract
Reply to: