Re: New security FAQ
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Because
> > >
> > > 1. it uses a different design while I preserved the existing one,
> > > which I find important.
> >
> > Different design?
>
> Not using
>
> <p><em>foo</em></p>
>
> but instead
>
> <h2>foo</h2>
>
> is a different design.
Oh, good then. You'll be pleased to hear that this is customizable with the
existing toc template, like this:
<define-tag toc-title-formatting endtag="required" whitespace="delete">
<p><strong>%body</strong></p>
</define-tag>
> > > 3. it doesn't work with multiline questions, which I also
> > > find important since not all of use like 150 chars per line.
> >
> > This can be fixed :)
>
> Great. Please do.
You already have the code, why not show it, and then I'll integrate it into
the toc template.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: