[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rdf files thought



On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 03:07:11PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >> <title>DSA-xxx package</title>
> >> <description>text from description tag</description>
> >> 
> >>  But the following would make much more sense:
> >> 
> >> <title>DSA-xxx package -- text from description tag</title>
> >> <description>text from moreinfo tag</description>
> >> 
> >>  I guess that would make much more sense, it would show the
> >> vulnerability shortdescription right beside the dsa name and not only
> >> the package, and the people can take a look a the real description.
> > 
> > Yes, but the description is long and people may not want it that way.
> 
>  It's not /that/ long, IMNSHO.
> 
> > IMHO it would be best if the current layout of a description (short) and
> > more-info (long) could be kept. 
> 
>  The current layout of the rdf file is description with just the DSA-#
> and the Packagename, and no moreinfo, in the description tag there is
> just the short description.
> 
>  I am not sure what you mean.  The current layout is short and short.
> My patch would make it short and long, just like you wrote.

But you'd expand both ones. This may not fit into other sites' layouts. 

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Reply to: