Re: Duplicated messages
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 01:36:05PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > > > > > > Same here. Though I did notice that some of the -www-cvs messages were
> > > > > > > > coming in late (that is, messages sent earlier come later than those that
> > > > > > > > were sent later) recently.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's a common mis-feature of Qmail. If messages are queued instead of
> > > > > > > sent out directly, it can take ages to get the Q flushed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But I didn't have any problems with my MTA (that would incite queueing), and
> > > > > > it didn't happen before IIRC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Goor morning, I was talking about murphy, not your mta.
> > > >
> > > > Good morning, I was talking about murphy, too.
> > >
> > > So since when is the mta on murphy *your* mta? Did I miss something?
> >
> > The MTA on murphy would defer and queue messages for me if my MTA wouldn't
> > accept the message. Maybe you are referring to something else?
>
> Hmm, apparently, let's waste some time and bandwidth:
>
> a) murphy doesn't deliver mail due to some reason
> b) mail gets queued
> c) murphy continues delivery
> d) new mails will be delivered at once
> e) queued mail will only be delivered occasionally
> f) new new mail will be delivered at once
> g) queued mail will only be delivered occasionally
> etc. etc.
>
> So, new mail reaches the recipient at once, old mail will take
> ages to get to the recipient.
Yes, but a) didn't happen for me. (Did it?)
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: