Re: update of the security page
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Michael Stone wrote:
> There has always been a valid reason for changing it. The last one
> (slink->potato) was to split the single archive directory into
> main,contrib,non-free. There are no further changes planned, but changes
So? That change was made for non-technical reasons, no legacy support was
done because nobody cared to do it. There is absolutely no reason the old
URLs could still not be workable today.
This is purely a policy problem, commit to keeping the current URLs valid
for a long time and it goes away.