[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: unconditional install -d in Make.common produces unneccessary errors (ignored)

On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 04:55:39PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > BTW now that web build is separated from dinstall, could we make the web
> > pages build+mirror every twelve hours? I doubt this would harm anyone,
> > master is less loaded these days, and mirrors don't care about 100Kb of
> > changes...
> The point of tying in with the dinstall run was not simply to prevent
> overload of master, but also to keep the Packages pages synchronized with
> the archive as much as possible.

Yes, I know that.

For generating the Packages pages you/we will have to make other
arrangements now that auric is the authoritive source for Packages files...

> Here is what I'd like to see happen (a few other issues thrown in here):
>  - Package pages generated dynamically (all ports would be handled).
>    update would be triggered by the end of the dinstall run

...and since master.d.o will now mirror its archive from auric, I guess it
would be logical to tie Packages/ generation+mirror with the auric->master
archive mirror run.

>  - list archives and bug pages handled separately from the rest of the web
>    pages

Agreed, that would be good.

It would be nice if bugs.debian.org and lists.debian.org web hosts were
made, and links set up from previous locations. That would enable us to
move those two services even to another machine (do I hear "lully"? :)
in future, if the need arises.

The new sites could have their own mirrors, and I bet there would be
less of them.

BTW the virtual host thing ( :) ) has already been done or will be done with
qa.debian.org and nm.debian.org, and it's working just fine.

>  - the rest of the web pages can then be mirrored more frequently

Yes. Also, the main site would be mirrored on more places then, most
people wouldn't mind mirroring 20 MB of our webwml stuff.

Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification

Reply to: