[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dame_gender

"J.M. Faer" <hello@jmf.codes> writes:

> What’s the point of this? This excludes non-binary, agender, and other gender non-conforming individuals. It just doesn’t seem like very useful data. 

Yes, the current state of development is so. I've plans to give a
probability by gender, for instance, from national statistics such as

Thanks for the feedback.


Reply to: