On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 01:47:22AM -0500, Joseph Neal wrote: > Hey, all > > I hate to stir up shit, but that's exactly what I'm doing. :( The tone on that thread has been really respectful up until now; if anyone does want to voice concern, please do maintain a very polite tone. This is way too easy to get upset about (also, trigger warning on the game and game description, it's pretty bad) > Several people have already objected but I hope there will be such a > resounding rejection that nobody considers submitting something like > this again in the future. All the debian project members that I've read so far are either undecided (due to not having played it, and waiting to evaluate if it has any artistic merit) or against it. I can think of a few people who'd likely support it's inclusion, but this isn't the mainstream viewpoint. There's an ftpteam meeting about this coming up, and there'll be an 'official' response. > I am not a member of the Debian Project. It > is my hope that enough people who do speak for the project will respond > to this with "hell no" that there is never any ambiguity regarding the > inclusion of this type of content again. > > The discussion starts here: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2014/03/msg00017.html Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature