Quoting Blair Noctis (2022-09-01 14:52:42) > I see that you've removed some dependencies of dist-* feature and for > Windows, which I didn't realize could be done. However I'm not sure > why the redis, memcached, gcs, azure, s3 features are removed. They are removed to get sccache into Debian sooner: When additional dependencies are in Debian we can link against those as well. > zstd is 0.5.1 in unstable, 0.11 on crates.io. I tried 0.11 on it with > no errors. But there's #969609 [1], not sure if I should push it. I don't understand what you mean by "push it". What needs doing regarding bug#969609 is (as I see it, but the bug belongs in the Rust team so I contradict anything said in that team then listen to them!) to package rust-zstd-safe - as indicated in the subject of that bugreport. > uuid is 0.8.1 in unstable, 1.1 on crates.io. Patching it is fairly > easy: Nice that patching is easy. Better would be to upgrade rust-uuid, but until that is done I am ok carrying a patch with sccache. Thanks! > counted-array, local-encoding, pulldown-cmark, skeptic, tokio-serde, > tower, tower-layer are packaged locally, with local-encoding patched > to use skeptic 0.13 instead of 0.4, removing the dependency on > tempdir. I'll push them later on. Again, not sure what you mean by "push them" - perhaps you are talking Rust-team lingo of pushing to the all-crates-in-one-giant-git repo - which I in Debian lingo would call packaging officially for Debian. NB! I don't mean to say that you are saying it wrong - only genuinely that I am uncertain what you mean: As I understand it, Rust team deliberately is "more Rust-like than Debian-like" to lower the bar for newcomers - where I consider it important for Debian packaging to be "more Debian-like" to ease the long-term maintenance. I certainly don't want to discourage newcomers in Debian - just tell you up front whenever your lingo confuses me and I hope you will do the same :-) > Btw, do you mind using salsa's issues and merge requests, or prefer > emails? I prefer not having to use Salsa - but I am not a hardcore do-it-all-with-mail either: I prefer pushing to git and then share in email an URI to wherever you pushed it - e.g. a git clone or (when you have write access) a temporary branch (I like the naming scheme wip/* for such throwaway branches). Speaking of write access: You should now have access to the repo in Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sccache - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature