[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#975505: packaging mathjax3 with Breaks mathjax2: How big of a problem?



Hi Mattia,

Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> writes:

> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 04:46:24PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>> Mattia, could Sigil's upstream be persuaded to switch to Mathjax3 before
>> the freeze?  Do you know of any other notable packages that this would
>> cause problems for?  Nothing LaTeX-related, I hope...
>
> Unfortunately, upstream tried last month, but unconvered plenty of
> regressions compared to mathjax2, so this is not going to happen anytime
> soon most likely.
> See https://github.com/Sigil-Ebook/Sigil/issues/453 for the sigil side,
> and https://github.com/mathjax/MathJax/issues/2836 for the bug the main
> sigil developer opened against mathjax (even if bug said that most of
> the reported bits are already fixed in PRs or such).
>

Thank you very much for the quick reply, Sigil upstream status, and
references!

Best,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: