[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#756017: Partial packaging



Hello Diane et. al.,

I am packaging gneiss[1], where one of its dependency is Bokeh. What is
the progress of Bokeh at this time? Additionally, is this a WIP?

Kind regards,
Shayan Doust

[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/gneiss

On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 00:22:04 +0200 Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?B?QsOpY3Vl?=
<peb@debian.org> wrote:
> Le mardi 08 septembre 2015 à 22:25:11-0700, Diane Trout a écrit :
> > I have a packaging tree that I'm using at:
> > https://github.com/detrout/python-bokeh
> > 
> > It can't be released to Debian until we find a solution for building BokehJS. 
> > (And that it also needs a jquery 2.1.1).
> > 
> > But at least its a start.
> 
> Dear Diane,
> 
> It seems that bokeh 1.3.4 ships a version of BokehJS that is
> non-minified and ready-to-use. Wouldn't that be a correct solution for
> an initial packaging, even though one could wish to finish the proper
> javascript package in a second time?
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> -- 
> Pierre-Elliott Bécue
> GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
> It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.

Attachment: 0x6D7D441919D02395.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: