[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#940570: gtk-layer-shell status



Hi,

On  Mi 08 Jan 2020 15:05:05 CET, Birger Schacht wrote:

Hi,

On 1/8/20 10:55 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Birger,

[...]

Wow! Very good work.

Thanks! And thanks for reviewing!

I only have one question / suggestion:

Q: Why did you name the dev:pkg libgtk-layer-shell0-dev rather than
libgtk-layer-shell-dev. For later SONAME changes / transitions, I guess
using libgtk-layer-shell-dev could be more handy / appropriate.

Lintian pointed out to me that libgtk-layer-shell should be named
according to SONAME, libgtk-layer-shell0, and I figured the other
packages should be named similar. But you're right, I'll drop the 0 from
the package name.

dev:pkg != lib:pkg regarding the SONAME in the pkg name. Please drop the 0 from the dev:pkg, then.

S: So I suggest renaming the dev:pkg and drop the SONAME version from
the pkg name.

ACK. I guess it would also make sense to rename the -examples and -doc
packages?

Haven't look once more, I guess both should be merged into one pkg: gtk-layer-shell-doc. Just an idea. Only reason to keep them separate would be one being arch:all (-doc) and the other being arch:any (-examples). If both are arch:all, then merge the two bin:pkgs into one.

Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
c\o Technik- und Ökologiezentrum Eckernförde
Mike Gabriel, Marienthaler str. 17, 24340 Eckernförde
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4351) 850 8940

GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22  0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31
mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

Attachment: pgpdpcQN2dp8u.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur


Reply to: