[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#940570: gtk-layer-shell status



Hi,

On 1/2/20 7:49 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Birger,
> 
> thanks for your interest in joining in with packaging gtk-layer-shell.
> 
> On  Di 31 Dez 2019 22:07:00 CET, Birger Schacht wrote:
[...]
> 
>> Maybe we can work together on this package or you can use the stuff I
>> already implemented (I haven't found a packaging repo in the mate team
>> for gtk-layer-shell so I figured you might not have started yet).
> 
> Yes, let's bundle resources. If you are not a DD yourself, I'll be happy
> to move your Git repo over to salsa/debian/gtk-layer-shell and we
> continue the packaging there. I haven't started anything, so far,
> regarding putting together a DEB package. (Sometimes, it is just good to
> wait... ;-) ).

Oke, feel free to move the repo any time. I'm neither DD nor DM, so you
would have to give me permissions to push to the repo if its in the
debian namespace.

> If you are not a DD, are you interested in a packaging review? Or shall
> I just go over your packaging and add my 2¢ here and there and then upload?

I'm happy about reviews! I have already some experience with packaging
and have more or less regular sponsors for some of my packages, but its
nice to have packages reviewed by new people, because different people
have different approaches to packaging ;)

> 
> Maintainer-wise, I'd say we put a package tracker email address into the
> Maintainer:-field and add the package to more than one team on
> tracker.debian.org. So all teams get informed on updates. Uploader-wise,
> we should put all persons' names into the field that are interested in
> its maintenance.

Oke, I'll do that. I'm using the 'bare debian' git packaging approach,
which is not very common, but I'm happy to switch to something else (I
read the PkgMate/GitPackaging page, but it still lists alioth, so I'm
not sure how authoritative it is...).
I'll can then ping you when I think the package is ready for review.

cheers,
Birger


Reply to: