Bug#904978: ITP: protobuf-2 -- This is the protobuf pacakge but version 2.6.1 same as that foudn in jessie but is being packaged to unstable since kotlin-1.1.1 needs it. p.s kotlin-1.1.1 is also being packaged to unstable.

To: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>, 904978@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#904978: ITP: protobuf-2 -- This is the protobuf pacakge but version 2.6.1 same as that foudn in jessie but is being packaged to unstable since kotlin-1.1.1 needs it. p.s kotlin-1.1.1 is also being packaged to unstable.
From: 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 21:05:19 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] c70b42df-933c-98f6-4dc3-b7253aca0acf@gmail.com>
Reply-to: 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com>, 904978@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 0c74f612-0f25-241c-6d4e-c86741d2f6b3@apache.org>
References: <[🔎] 31713221-e39a-46ae-95e6-808f5a207c5b@gmail.com> <[🔎] 0c74f612-0f25-241c-6d4e-c86741d2f6b3@apache.org> <153293343658.4114.5411894614391717461.reportbug@m36>

It needs JetBriains's fork of JDOM [1].

[1]: https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-deps-jdom

Emmanuel Bourg 於 2018年08月09日 16:33 寫道:
>> We can do this to `picocontainer`, `protobuf`,`spullara-cli-parser`
>> and `jdom`.
> 
> We already have two version of jdom (libjdom1-java and libjdom2-java).
> What is the version required by Kotlin?
> 
> Emmanuel Bourg
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#904978: ITP: protobuf-2 -- This is the protobuf pacakge but version 2.6.1 same as that foudn in jessie but is being packaged to unstable since kotlin-1.1.1 needs it. p.s kotlin-1.1.1 is also being packaged to unstable.
  - From: 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com>
- Bug#904978: ITP: protobuf-2 -- This is the protobuf pacakge but version 2.6.1 same as that foudn in jessie but is being packaged to unstable since kotlin-1.1.1 needs it. p.s kotlin-1.1.1 is also being packaged to unstable.
  - From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>