Is this version of protobuf only required by Kotlin? I am thinking that maybe we can just include all those legacy libraries (and possibly JetBrains-modified ones) inside either Kotlin or `intellij-core` as they tend to be used only by those 2 projects at the moment. Thus we can really save a great amount of time from waiting for the NEW queue. We can do this to `picocontainer`, `protobuf`,`spullara-cli-parser` and `jdom`. Saif Abdul Cassim 於 2018年07月30日 19:02 寫道: > kotlin is already bulky and needs atleast 8-9 more new pacakges and some of them are older versions, including all of them will make things more messed up when we try to update this. Kotlin 1.1.1 is not just for bootstrapping it provides the full functionality of kotlin 1.1.1. > > On 30 July 2018 at 16:13, Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org <mailto:cjwatson@debian.org>> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 05:23:15PM +0800, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan wrote: > > Yes, that Kotlin by Jetbrains. Packaging a language is quite > > complicated, and we are bootstrapping an older version (so the process > > can be a lot easier), and then we will update it to the latest version > > once it's accepted. > > If it's just for bootstrapping, I'd consider temporarily embedding the > older protobuf version in the kotlin source package instead, with a note > that this will be removed once you're on a current version. That should > be less work for ftpmasters, quite possibly even less work for you, and > it doesn't make it look like the old version of protobuf is being > packaged for general use. > > -- > Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org <mailto:cjwatson@debian.org>] > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature