В Чт, 08/12/2016 в 19:08 +0100, W. Martin Borgert пишет: > I was under the impression that their server name is somehow > hardcoded into the software. That's actually a good point, I should make it be configurable. Hopefully, this won't cause rejection from NEW. > If the software makes sense without any proprietary service, > then it fits in main, of course. I believe, lots of software in Debian main don't make any sense for many users even being completely standalone or functioning along a free service? I'm glad that Debian Policy isn't restricting nor addressing this at all (so far) -- makes a huge sense to me. Thanks for a good point.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part