2014-04-24 18:19 GMT+02:00 László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org>:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:40 PM, David Moreno MonteroOK, will do.
<dmoreno@coralbits.com> wrote:
> If you agree, you may branch the onion source at github, and pull request me the changes.
Better if not. 1) Not all users will have internet access for CDN. 2)
> About jquery, is it ok to include it non-minified? Also could be used straight from the jquery CDN, but somehow I feel users would feel more secure if its using only local resources.
jQuery may have performance / security issues anytime. Just depend on
the needed version, as it's already packaged and taken care of.
OK, waiting for that.
> About library versioning, I just added it, but I got a bug report that its not following proper libtool standards. I'm still fixing that, but the current solution should be on the debian branch.
For a start you may use 'apt-get install help2man; man help2man'.
> About manpages, I can try to prepare them ASAP, but some tips are welcome about how to create great manpages: which programs/commands? is groff the recomended way?
One more problem btw. LICENSE.txt states: "Contents of the src folder
(the Library) is licensed under both GPLv2+ and Apache 2." while
README.rst states: "The library is under the LGPL license, [...]"
(which one?), then see a file, for example src/onion/block.c which has
only Apache 2.0 license header. Which one is correct? Then you link
together everything with src/onion/sd-daemon.[ch] which is licensed
under MIT. I'm not a license expert and don't know what the result
will be. Does linking MIT with (L)GPL code allowed? Where's / how MIT
license vanished from the resulting library?
Laszlo/GCS
David Moreno Montero
dmoreno@coralbits.com
+34 658 18 77 17
+44 74 23 21 01 57
http://www.coralbits.com