On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 02:38:40PM +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 09:52:24AM +0000, Javi Merino wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:51:10PM +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote: > > > > Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > > > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low > > > > > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it > > > > > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took > > > > > over. > > > > > > > > I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules > > > > Team umbrella. I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape, > > > > impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks! All I can > > > > think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the > > > > debian/rules . I may do it just to justify the upload that changes > > > > the Maintainer field ;) > > > Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems > > > reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days? > > > > No, unfortunately it's still svn. I use git-svn and git-buildpackage > > with some packages though. > > > > > Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer? > > > > Of course you can be co-maintainer! Would you mind if I moved it to > > the Python Modules Team svn though? > > Hmm, maybe I should hold on to the package for a little while longer. > I'd rather not see the history lost because of importing to svn. I can > move it into the Python Modules Team once they migrate to Git. Ok, so shall we migrate it to git then?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature