[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#724345: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion



On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 09:52:24AM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:51:10PM +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Hi Javi,
> > 
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> > > Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low
> > > > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it
> > > > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took
> > > > over.
> > > 
> > > I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules
> > > Team umbrella.  I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape,
> > > impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks!  All I can
> > > think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the
> > > debian/rules .  I may do it just to justify the upload that changes
> > > the Maintainer field ;)
> > Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems
> > reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days?
> 
> No, unfortunately it's still svn.  I use git-svn and git-buildpackage
> with some packages though.
> 
> > What is pybuilder? I don't think I've come across it before.
> 
> I meant pybuild.  It's fairly recent.  It's an easy way of making
> packages that support multiple versions of python and removes most of
> the pyversions "loops" in debian/rules:
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Pybuild
> 
> > Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer?
> 
> Of course you can be co-maintainer!  Would you mind if I moved it to
> the Python Modules Team svn though?

Hmm, maybe I should hold on to the package for a little while longer.
I'd rather not see the history lost because of importing to svn. I can
move it into the Python Modules Team once they migrate to Git.

Cheers,

Jelmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: