[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#739997: mumble: adopt package without maintainer response?



On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 14:59:56 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> (Ccing the current maintainers of mumble)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 17/03/14 at 18:21 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > Greetings.
> > 
> > I'm looking to adopt the mumble package after a long period of inactivity
> > from the current maintainer (last activity 2012-11-12 in #691535), who is
> > not totally MIA but whom has not responded to contact attempts.  Last
> > year the package fell out of Testing and I was eventually contacted by
> > others to help. With some difficulty in finding a sponsor I was able to
> > upload a newer version in late November, then uploaded fixes for two CVEs
> > that were found later. Unfortunately the latest version in the Vcs
> > contains these CVEs (and also has its base communication codec removed).
> > 
> > After some discussion on [debian-devel] I decided to file an ITA (#739997)
> > to offer to adopt the package, but I haven't gotten any response in 3
> > weeks. I've also tried to contact the maintainer via IRC in #debian-devel
> > but haven't gotten a response there either.
> > 
> > Since filing the ITA I've found that there have been several discussions
> > in
> > [debian-devel] on this issue [1] [2] and a common suggestion seems to be
> > getting some kind of group consensus for adopting the package rather than
> > an individual developer making that decision, and specifically suggesting
> > seeking input from [debian-qa] for this purpose.
> > 
> > So is it okay for me to adopt the package?
> 
> I looked at the state of the package. There's nothing that requires
> immediate action, but there are a number of things that could be
> improved (there's a new upstream release available, 1.2.5, since
> 2014-02-05; there are several important bugs with no comment from the
> maintainer).
>
> Given that you seem to have been doing the maintenance work lately, I
> personally have no objection to you adopting the package.
> 
> To move forward, I propose giving the maintainers until 2014-04-01 to
> object.

Okay.

> In the meantime, it would be nice if you could work on the known
> open issues -- that's work that will be useful whether you adopt the
> package, become part of a maintenance team, or just hand over the
> patches to the current maintainers.

I have a 1.2.5-245-g221a5d7 package created which Patrick Matthäi is helping 
me further improve, which would close #676880, #731003, and #740605.  There 
are several other bugs I'm not able to replicate which my no longer apply to 
more recent versions of the package; I'll have a look at those after the 
preparations for 1.2.5-245 are complete.

Thanks.

  -- Chris

--
Chris Knadle
Chris.Knadle@coredump.us

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: