[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#739997: mumble: adopt package without maintainer response?



(Ccing the current maintainers of mumble)

Hi,

On 17/03/14 at 18:21 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> Greetings.
> 
> I'm looking to adopt the mumble package after a long period of inactivity from 
> the current maintainer (last activity 2012-11-12 in #691535), who is not 
> totally MIA but whom has not responded to contact attempts.  Last year the 
> package fell out of Testing and I was eventually contacted by others to help.  
> With some difficulty in finding a sponsor I was able to upload a newer version 
> in late November, then uploaded fixes for two CVEs that were found later.  
> Unfortunately the latest version in the Vcs contains these CVEs (and also has 
> its base communication codec removed).
> 
> After some discussion on [debian-devel] I decided to file an ITA (#739997) to 
> offer to adopt the package, but I haven't gotten any response in 3 weeks.  
> I've also tried to contact the maintainer via IRC in #debian-devel but haven't 
> gotten a response there either.
> 
> Since filing the ITA I've found that there have been several discussions in 
> [debian-devel] on this issue [1] [2] and a common suggestion seems to be 
> getting some kind of group consensus for adopting the package rather than an 
> individual developer making that decision, and specifically suggesting seeking 
> input from [debian-qa] for this purpose.
> 
> So is it okay for me to adopt the package?

I looked at the state of the package. There's nothing that requires
immediate action, but there are a number of things that could be
improved (there's a new upstream release available, 1.2.5, since
2014-02-05; there are several important bugs with no comment from the
maintainer).

Given that you seem to have been doing the maintenance work lately, I
personally have no objection to you adopting the package.

To move forward, I propose giving the maintainers until 2014-04-01 to
object.

In the meantime, it would be nice if you could work on the known
open issues -- that's work that will be useful whether you adopt the
package, become part of a maintenance team, or just hand over the
patches to the current maintainers.

Lucas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: