Benjamin Drung wrote: > Are you talking about bug #653112 (disabling the "non-intrusive ads" > "feature" by default) or are you talking about patching the complete > "non-intrusive ads" out? Feel free to join the Debian Mozilla Extension > Maintainers team and apply the patch in case of the former. The patch > would be too huge in case of the latter. I scanned a diff between > adblock-plus and adblockedge. Part of the diff was ripping > "non-intrusive ads" out and the other part was for renaming the > extension. I came to the conclusion that it is simpler to maintain the > adblockegde fork. What's the point in patching it out, if it's disabled by default? It seems to me that getting #653112 fixed, which presumably involves changing a True to a False somewhere in the code, should be easier than maintaining an entire separate package going forward. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature