No worries we all have family and or other commitments so I understand. I also noticed the beta release when i got a notification about my upstream fork pull request getting merged into main. This may drop the need for one of the Debian patches. Because this is a simpler python tool and upstream is usually quiet I figure this is good way to get into Debian maintenance. I would still like to work on this. I will put together a beta and ask you again about sponsoring. Thanks for your time.
Jay Berkenbilt <qjb@debian.org> wrote:
> Robinson Sathaseevan <robinson@sathas.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jay,
>>
>> I have an upload of the latest version over at mentors. That's because
>> I don't have permission to commit to the svn repository for debian/*
>> as a new maintainer.
>> See: http://mentors.debian.net/package/s3cmd
>>
>> There's an RFS bug open as well:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714292
>>
>> Jakub Wilk from QA team reviewed and gave me feedback on first upload.
>> I've corrected and patched based on his findings and re-uploaded.
>>
>> Would you be interested in reviewing and sponsoring?
>>
>> Robinson
>
> Sure, I'd be glad to do that. It will probably be sometime next week at
> the earliest before I can get to it. I won't be offended if someone
> beats me to it (of course), but I will try to squeeze it in as soon as I
> can.
Well, I'm really embarrassed that five months have passed since this
discussion. I had checked a while ago to find that s3cmd was not on
mentors.debian.net anymore and that the status of this bug report was
unchanged. Now there's a beta release of 1.5.0 that should be packaged.
Are you still interested? If you're interested in sponsorship, I can
try to be more responsive, or I can adopt the package. Looks like
upstream is pretty quiet.
--
Jay Berkenbilt <qjb@debian.org>