[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#674916: status of s3cmd packaging



Jay Berkenbilt <qjb@debian.org> wrote:

> Robinson Sathaseevan <robinson@sathas.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jay,
>>
>> I have an upload of the latest version over at mentors. That's because
>> I don't have permission to commit to the svn repository for debian/*
>> as a new maintainer.
>> See: http://mentors.debian.net/package/s3cmd
>>
>> There's an RFS bug open as well:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714292
>>
>> Jakub Wilk from QA team reviewed and gave me feedback on first upload.
>> I've corrected and patched based on his findings and re-uploaded.
>>
>> Would you be interested in reviewing and sponsoring?
>>
>> Robinson
>
> Sure, I'd be glad to do that.  It will probably be sometime next week at
> the earliest before I can get to it.  I won't be offended if someone
> beats me to it (of course), but I will try to squeeze it in as soon as I
> can.

Well, I'm really embarrassed that five months have passed since this
discussion.  I had checked a while ago to find that s3cmd was not on
mentors.debian.net anymore and that the status of this bug report was
unchanged.  Now there's a beta release of 1.5.0 that should be packaged.
Are you still interested?  If you're interested in sponsorship, I can
try to be more responsive, or I can adopt the package.  Looks like
upstream is pretty quiet.

-- 
Jay Berkenbilt <qjb@debian.org>


Reply to: