Re: Patch for http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi Nathan,
Le 11/11/2012 22:00, Nathan Handler a écrit :
> I have prepared a patch based on the files in CVS to fix this issue.
Thanks a lot, it's appreciated. I twisted it a little bit to keep the
“do not file another bug report”-warning.
> I read through the various documentation, but I did not find a better way to submit patches.
Bug reports against www.debian.org are better (public place, more
readers with commit access). It's one of the few existing
pseudo-packages in that purpose.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages
> Also, I do feel a little uncomfrtable linking to a non-Debian website,
> but I was unable to find these changes documented elsewhere
It's actually documented, so I used the following link (I just added the
anchor, it will work in a few hours, but you can seek for “control:” in
the page to spot the part I'm referring to).
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#control
Here is the modified and already applied patch, the updated page will
show up online in a few hours, feel free to follow up if needed
(preferably on the public debian-www@l.d.o mailing list).
> +<p>
> +<strong>Attention:</strong> if you need to reassign, retitle, or set the
> +owner of bug reports, you must do so by emailing the BTS control bot
> +<a href="$(HOME)/Bugs/server-control">directly</a> or by emailing the report
> +number @bugs.debian.org and using
> +<a href="$(HOME)/Bugs/Reporting#control">Control pseudo-headers</a>,
> +but <strong>not</strong> by filing new reports.
> +</p>
Regards
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=G+kl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: