On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 20:44 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 13:05 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > 3. firmware-nonfree _really_ needs a README.source :-)
> > > >
> > > > Yeah.
> > [...]
> >
> > Fixed in svn; let me know if it's missing anything.
>
> Ah, it helps a lot, thanks. Reading it, I think I know where I went wrong.
>
> A few questions: x86 microcode really is useful only for arch i386 and
> amd64. Should I leave it as arch all? I am not sure firmware-nonfree is
> prepared to have arch-specific packages, but...
Since there is currently no way to say that a package can be installed
on these two architectures, I would say arch:all.
> I may also need to add a Depends: to the control file template, but it looks
> straightforward to do that.
Right, just follow the pattern for the other package relations.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Lowery's Law:
If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part