[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#612341: bumblebee, libjpeg-turbo: Wheezy does not work well with modern notebook PCs.



On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Guido Vollbeding <guido@jpegclub.org> wrote:
> Hello Mathieu
>
> Thank you for question.
> libjpeg is reference code, not faulty patchwork.
> Everything is said in the README:
>
>  There are currently distributions in circulation containing the name
>  "libjpeg" which claim to be a "derivative" or "fork" of the original
>  libjpeg, but don't have the features and are incompatible with formats
>  supported by actual IJG libjpeg distributions.  Furthermore, they
>  violate the license conditions as described under LEGAL ISSUES above.
>  We have no sympathy for the release of misleading and illegal
>  distributions derived from obsolete code bases.
>  Don't use an obsolete code base!
>
> I mean, the original README in libjpeg, not that in the patchwork you
> are talking about, which is one of the license violations.
>
> It seems that Bill Allombert is still one of the few sane people out
> there, many others have apparently gone mad.
> I don't care for the ignorant people.
>
> You may of course make a "turbo" version, I have nothing against it,
> but NOT in the way mentioned.  Take libjpeg with its current features
> and make it "turbo" - that would be wonderful!

For reference: http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/About/FUD
As we can see, "the other camp" doesn't agree.
I would like to avoid political/legal/off-topic discussions that
doesn't belong to this bug report or LJT ITP. Thanks.



Reply to: