Bug#612341: bumblebee, libjpeg-turbo: Wheezy does not work well with modern notebook PCs.
- To: Guido Vollbeding <guido@jpegclub.org>, 612341@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com>, Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>, Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>, Mike Gabriel <mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de>, Ivan Baldo <ibaldo@adinet.com.uy>, Igor Urazov <z0rc3r@gmail.com>, ballombe@debian.org
- Subject: Bug#612341: bumblebee, libjpeg-turbo: Wheezy does not work well with modern notebook PCs.
- From: Fathi Boudra <fabo@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 07:06:07 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] CANZTuJqKH5HV2ZQJr_RvhHyqsiCbNqgHfathxeUN0gPG_WXbpw@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Fathi Boudra <fabo@debian.org>, 612341@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4FC54A73.2090106@jpegclub.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20120526151102.GA9031@localhost> <[🔎] 20120526183146.629042o05hljl8j6@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <[🔎] 20120526183439.GA20618@localhost> <[🔎] 20120527144008.GB2452@yellowpig> <[🔎] CANZTuJoA6vBGJmcQChnb6gaAvYz9T0fxk3Sr2OoNisujMPTdWg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20120529195316.GB1382@yellowpig> <[🔎] CA+7wUsyAkDrsinmKBPekLAv66KvoEXaivD2SON3M5nqsLfP4Ww@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 4FC54A73.2090106@jpegclub.org>
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Guido Vollbeding <guido@jpegclub.org> wrote:
> Hello Mathieu
>
> Thank you for question.
> libjpeg is reference code, not faulty patchwork.
> Everything is said in the README:
>
> There are currently distributions in circulation containing the name
> "libjpeg" which claim to be a "derivative" or "fork" of the original
> libjpeg, but don't have the features and are incompatible with formats
> supported by actual IJG libjpeg distributions. Furthermore, they
> violate the license conditions as described under LEGAL ISSUES above.
> We have no sympathy for the release of misleading and illegal
> distributions derived from obsolete code bases.
> Don't use an obsolete code base!
>
> I mean, the original README in libjpeg, not that in the patchwork you
> are talking about, which is one of the license violations.
>
> It seems that Bill Allombert is still one of the few sane people out
> there, many others have apparently gone mad.
> I don't care for the ignorant people.
>
> You may of course make a "turbo" version, I have nothing against it,
> but NOT in the way mentioned. Take libjpeg with its current features
> and make it "turbo" - that would be wonderful!
For reference: http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/About/FUD
As we can see, "the other camp" doesn't agree.
I would like to avoid political/legal/off-topic discussions that
doesn't belong to this bug report or LJT ITP. Thanks.
Reply to: