[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#612341: bumblebee, libjpeg-turbo: Wheezy does not work well with modern notebook PCs.



Hi,

This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be closed by Fathi sometime early
January.  Nothing happened.  http://bugs.debian.org/612341

In the meantime, Ubuntu package was updated to generate -dev etc.
 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo

libjpeg-turbo (1.1.90+svn733-0ubuntu4) precise; urgency=low

  * Install jpegint.h in the -dev package.
  * Install jconfig.h in the multiarch include directory.
 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden>   Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:02:38 +0100

This package can be build on sid (under pbuilder) nicely practically as
is and also makes libjpeg-turbo8.  So ABI of version 8 is taken care as
I understand.

Also, Mike Gabriel's work seems to have done somethings interesting on
old Fathi's version and made many improvements.

Concurrently, upstream has released newer libjpeg-turbo-1.2.0.tar.gz

So I do not understand why this is not uploaded.  This is blocking
bumblebee support for wheezy.  This makes the next Debian Wheezy
non-optimal for many modern notebook PC users since this is blocking
bumblebee upload.
 https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/Bumblebee/wiki/FAQ

It seems touching up Ubuntu package seems to be the simplest thing to
get this package into Debian before FREEZE (JUNE!).

Once this is done, all other required pieces are in Ubuntu
 https://launchpad.net/~bumblebee
 https://launchpad.net/~bumblebee/+archive/stable/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=precise

For Debian, http://suwako.nomanga.net/ is good archive.  It works.  (I
can not find source package for the virtualgl package here but above
Ubuntu site has it anyway.)  I am using this package but wish to get it
into Debian.

Since no action has been taken for many months and FREEZE is coming, I
hope Fathi does not mind someone else uploading this package and get
things moving.

Any thoughts?

Regards,

Osamu



Reply to: