Bug#654924: Fwd: Re: TigerVNC 1.0.90 src debs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.02.2012 20:00, schrieb Joachim Falk:
> Am 23.02.2012 13:04, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
>> Hi Joachim,
>
>> On Do 23 Feb 2012 11:47:45 CET Joachim Falk wrote:
>
>>> Hmm. Wait a bit. At the moment I am at work. Maybe this evening I have
>>> time to update my package to tigervnc 1.1.90. I already began yeasterday
>>> with this. And you are right there is now only cmake. I have begun
>>> to integrate the xorg server and the tigervnc sources into their own
>>> subdirs as git projects and svn checkouts. The quilt problem runs much
>>> deeper. Quilt for the toplevel project is no problem I think. However,
>>> the xorg tree has its own quilt files which have to be applied too.
>
>> Hang on. I would love to prepare the package via Git on git.debian.org.
>> I am about to commit (at the weekend, probably) a version that is based
>> on 1.1.90 and uses quilt and cmake via cdbs.
>
>> Do you have an account on Alioth? I really want to recommend package
>> development under Git.
Did you create your version on Alioth?
> Well git is a distributed version control system ;)
>
> git clone http://xiao.jfalk.de/~joachim/tigervnc/tigervnc.git
Mine is as denoted above. It is still not fully functional. But
the patch system is finalized. Some patches from my tigervnc 1.1.0 deb
are already applied. The tigervnc and xorg tree integration is mostly
finished. I still seem to have a problem with the generation of the
automake/autoconf build files for the xorg tree.
>
>> Thanks!
>> Mike
>
> Regards,
> Joachim
Regards,
Joachim
- --
Joachim Falk <Joachim.Falk@gmx.de>
You can always tell a really good idea by the enemies it makes.
--programmers' axiom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=7fOs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: