Bug#628997: gecko-mediaplayer maintenance
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 00:52, Sebastian Ramacher <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 05:11 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
>> Ok, thank you to let me know. Is the package ready on your side? If
>> yes, I'll upload it.
> Is debian/copyright okay? Or should we document the licenses from the build
> system (as in gecko-mediaplayer) there too?
> Otherwise it's ready from my side.
> Kind regards,
> Sebastian Ramacher
IMHO for the most commonly used build systems, like autotools and cmake, the
license of those files can be omitted in d/copyright.
As you had mentioned, I did a quick check for gecko-mediaplayer's copyright and
found two problems:
1.INSTALL is not licensed under GFDL, also GFDL isn't DFSG Free.
2.For files that have multiple licenses, for example MPL-1.1, GPL-2+
we need to add the "license block" in d/copyright, also including the
actual text of
those three licenses.