[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#635504: ITP: flashcache -- write back block device cache for Linux



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Dmitry,

On 18.09.2011 16:25, onlyjob wrote:
> When you mention technical problems, I wish you could be more specific.

You made some semantic errors Lintian can't detect in its purpose as
static analysis tool. As I said, I didn't extensively check your
package. Among the most obvious things are:

* For example the VCS fields do not denote upstreams VCS, but the
packaging VCS in Debian.
* You provide no mechanism to setup a flashcache volume on boot.
* You are not supposed to copy the DKMS script into your package, but to
invoke them at runtime.
* You close an ITP bug you don't own ... mine.
* Code of Flashcache is GPL-2 _only_ but you release your Debian
packaging as GPL-3+. That will cause trouble as soon as you need to
merge patches (at least).

> I don't quite see the point in merging something working into
> something what doesn't work, and not the other way.

Fair enough. Please note this is not how we work in Debian, though. I am
the owner of the ITP bug and I made visible progress since I filed the
ITP. You will very likely have a hard time in finding a sponsor while
trying to hijack someone else's packages.
This does not give you very much alternatives to my offer, besides of
stepping down as maintainer (in Debian) completely. Your approach wasn't
exactly polite and yet I offered you to form a team together with me.

> (With all due respect there are more than some minor things you didn't
> address i.e. your package is not usable yet even though you did a lot
> of work.)

I didn't say my package would be ready to use. That's the reason why I
didn't try to introduce it to Debian yet. However I believe, the package
is (sort of) usable as is. If you find some problems, I am eager for
letting me know.

> For practical reasons giving up working package may be not the best
> option for people who might need it.

Merging is not exactly the same as giving up. Also, Debian is not only
about working packages, but also about quality packages, and that takes
time. Something which "just works" somehow is trivial to achieve.

Note, by that I didn't want to imply at all that your package would not
be a quality package. I am just not confident enough about mine yet, as
I know it lacks certain features including but not limited to tested
init.d support and manpages.

- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=0NEQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: