Bug#573206: Cheers from upstream
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 20:39, Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:16:11PM +0200, Alexander Shulgin wrote:
>>
>> As I look around this, I see that "ITP" means "Intent to Package".
>> Isn't there someone who's readily trying to package png++ or it's more
>> like 'request to package'? If it's more like a wishlist thing, I
>> think I can try to package it myself. But I give no ETAs. ;)
>
> RFP means Request For Packaging - i.e. please can someone package this.
>
> ITP means Intend To Package - i.e. This is in planning stage of actually
> getting packaged.
>
> And in this case it was a short process: I filed the ITP while actually
> packaging, and the package was sent to Debian as soon as the Bug Tracker
> responded with a bug number that I could tie to the initial release.
OK, thanks for explanation. If it is in process already, then I don't
need to do anything.
Just let me know if you need my help in any png++-related matters. :)
--
Alex
Reply to: