On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Marcus Better <marcus@better.se> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, what is the use case for Sesame in Virtuoso? IIUC Virtuoso was going to work as a separate backend for Nepomuk (?), independent of Sesame.
From what I understand, it's a connector between Virtuoso and Sesame. It has nothing to do with Nepomuk.
In other words, does it make sense to put effort into packaging Sesame as a Nepomuk backend?
As far as I understand, the current effort is behind packaging Virtuoso as a Nepomuk backend to replace Redland, so indeed, working on Sesame as Nepomuk backend is not important. Remember that Redland, Sesame and Virtuoso have use cases outside of Nepomuk :) That's what I was thinking about when talking about Virtuoso's optional dependency on Sesame. Cheers Arthur
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature