[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#512396: Virtuoso packaging build-depending on sesame



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

what is the use case for Sesame in Virtuoso? IIUC Virtuoso was going to
work as a separate backend for Nepomuk (?), independent of Sesame.

In other words, does it make sense to put effort into packaging Sesame
as a Nepomuk backend?

Cheers,

Marcus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAktE/G0ACgkQXjXn6TzcAQmHgQCgyz2GqxqjeefmhYY6/sahnmLY
x/QAoL1S19HO/rc+tbUvGDaoH7GqLlIq
=yv/a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: