[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#535691: Bug #535691,RFH: munin -- help packaging 1.3 to experimental and report bugs upstream



Holger Levsen wrote:
> Nope, it's not: 
> 
> $ dpkg --compare-versions 1.4.0-dev+svn2484 lt 1.4.0-1 ; echo $?
> 1
> $ dpkg --compare-versions 1.4.0-dev+svn2484 gt 1.4.0-1 ; echo $?
> 0
> 
> Please use 1.4.0~dev+svn2484, so that we can upload 1.4.0-1 if we want to :-)
> 
> Hmm, 1.4.0~svn2481-1 is even better or 1.4.0~dev+svn2484-1...
> 

Thanks for noticing :), I've changed the name to 1.4.0~svn2481-1.

> 
> Just to be clear: you committed to trunk or did you modify trunk by means of 
> debian/patches/ ?

I committed the non-debian specific changes to trunk, not through patches. I
spoke to Nicolai, and he said that it's ok to fix these kind of trivial issues
(such as http://munin.projects.linpro.no/changeset/2471) directly in trunk,
and its even OK for not such trivial issues as he's looking at commits and
will keep an eye to make sure everything is in order. I think this is the best
way, as then we don't need so many patches on top of the orig.tar.gz, and the
rest non-debian munin users will benefit from the fixes as well.

> IMO we should leave this (lintian warnings) as they are, as these are issues 
> we/upstream need to fix. Changing the location from /var/www 
> to /srv/www/munin or such is something I would really like to see fixed for 
> squeeze, but I'm not really sure what is the best location. Maybe we should 
> start a thread on debian-devel@ to gather information+opinions how other 
> packages handle that.

OK, I'll leave /var/www/munin as is until we're sure of what we want to do
about it.

> 
>> W: munin: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/munin/VeraMono.ttf
> 
> debian/rules should delete that file and we should use this font from the 
> proper package already in Debian.

I guess debian has the same VeraMono.ttf in the package:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/ttf-dejavu (although the name is a bit
different - DejaVuSansMono.ttf).

I've opened bug http://bugs.debian.org/548508 for this issue. and committed a
patch to fix this in experimental.


Regards,
    Tom Feiner

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: