Bug#547225: O: ne -- Nice Editor, an easy-to-use and powerful editor
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:14, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2009-09-22 09:11 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:01, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2009-09-21 23:31 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 23:02, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>> | I: ne: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 2424kB 89%
>>>>
>>>> could not be an issue.
>>>
>>> If I'll ask for an RFS, I want to fix this first. Should not be too
>>> difficult and would give me some packaging training.
>>
>> yes, but I didn't look at the package so I don't know if it's really
>> something to fix (for example, if it's all documentation, then yes a
>> -doc package is highly encouraged).
>
> Indeed, most of it is documentation:
>
> ,----
> | % du -s /usr/share/doc/ne /usr/share/info/ne* /usr/share/ne
> | 2052 /usr/share/doc/ne
> | 60 /usr/share/info/ne.info.gz
> | 316 /usr/share/ne
> `----
>
> My plan would be to split the documentation out into ne-doc, but leave
> the runtime files under /usr/share/ne in the main package for now,
> although they could be moved to an ne-data package as well. What is
> your opinion?
if they are absolutely needed to ne to work, you can leave there; but
anyhow, for 300k I won't bother that much to split a package.
>>> Regardless of whether I do that or not, I have just asked to be added to
>>> the collab-maint group so that I can put my Git repository there (don't
>>> want to use my home directory on Alioth for that package).
>>
>> Note that QA uploads don't need to be "that difficult" to do, so also
>> a git repo could be overkilling: probably the next uploaders won't use
>> the collab-qa repository (because they don't like git, don't want to
>> deal with a SCM, etc).
>
> I'll take that into consideration.
Thanks.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Reply to: