Bug#520661: O: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:41:16AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:35:53AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:17:31AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > >
> > > retitle 520661 ITA: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner
> > > owner 520661 asac@debian.org
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > Package: wnpp
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > >
> > > > See the great thread about "Sponsorship requirements and copyright files" on
> > > > debian-devel to understand why.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I have not read through mail archive to understand why this triggered
> > > your move, but for now I take the ITA for this package ... could be
> > > that i jump off after reading that thread for sure :).
I have read the thread now a bit and I agree that listing all
copyright holders in debian/copyright is really a stupid; debian is
not maintaining and distributing a perfect list of IP owners for
source code; we distribute software. Period.
- Alexander
Reply to: