Bug#520661: O: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner
retitle 520661 O: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner
thanks
orphaning back in case fresh blood wants to work on this.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:35:53AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:17:31AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> >
> > retitle 520661 ITA: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner
> > owner 520661 asac@debian.org
> > thanks
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > See the great thread about "Sponsorship requirements and copyright files" on
> > > debian-devel to understand why.
> > >
> >
> > I have not read through mail archive to understand why this triggered
> > your move, but for now I take the ITA for this package ... could be
> > that i jump off after reading that thread for sure :).
> >
> > Can you make your git tree public somewhere so that the transition
> > will be technically more or less seemless?
>
> I'm not sure this is a good idea you jump in on xulrunner. Because that
> would mean more work for you, and I know you already have enough work,
> and that would also mean the mozilla team would basically not grow.
>
> Moreover, I'm not sure I will be able to keep my promise of actually
> stopping to maintain it...
>
dude, if thats the case then don't orphan it :) ... or at least tell
me offline that you want to use this O: to attract contributors rather
than giving it away.
In the end I still have the dream to eliminate one huge duplication of
work - which xulrunner is imo. If we could share sources packages here
and there it would be a huge win imo.
- Alexander
Reply to: