Bug#515544: (no subject)
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Trent W. Buck <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 08:22:51AM -0800, Daniel Moerner wrote:
>> I am willing to adopt scheme48. I currently maintain ypsilon, an
>> R6RS Scheme interpreter that is waiting in NEW. Ypsilon only
>> supports amd64 and x86; I still use scheme48 on my powerpc and armel
> Cool, let me know what you need from me to action that.
Nothing at all beyond the original ITP, I just need to make an upload
when I'm ready. I just wanted to give you some background.
>> Fourth, I presume that pkg-scheme48 is a dead group?
> I certainly have no involvement with it. I think it was set up when
> Jorgen was co-maintaining scheme48 with another DD (Emilio?).
>> I would have no issue with starting a pkg-scheme group, or at least
>> a way to coordinate scsh with scheme48.
> scsh is also orphaned, because even back when I was using s48 I was
> trying to drop my scsh dependencies. You may wish to adopt scsh as
> well :-)
That's something to consider, although I think I will take my time on
moving forward with that.
>> Thanks for orphaning a package that is not a mess.
> You're welcome, although probably if I were you the first thing I'd do
> is move it to dh(1) ;-)
It was the first thing I did :)
Daniel Moerner <firstname.lastname@example.org>