On Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2008-07-24 16:42, Christoph Haas wrote: > > Weird. I wasn't aware of an existing python-babel. And I'm especially > > suprised that the FTP masters didn't see the conflict either. > > That's weird, indeed. Nor did anybody reply to your ITP and > upload mails. The existing python-babel is build from source > package "babel", while yours is binary=source=python-babel. > So there is no conflict in the source names. That would explain it. Adeodato Simó (dato) has just agreed to unblock my my package for Lenny. > Btw. python-pybabel would be an option for the name, as the > packaged executable is called pybabel, right? You read my mind. That's what I'm currently renaming it to. :) Kindly Christoph
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.