[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#383316: Repackaging tarball



On Tue May 01 12:01, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> I seriously doubt it, but we might try. In any case we should have a
> preplacement available, even if it's a different one than the original. Maybe
> it would be wise to give upstream an option to have a say in the decision too?

Sure

> I still expect that at some point in the future, amanith developers will put
> the code GPL, and then the usage of amanith will be optional (it seems the
> graphics are cuter with svg than with png).
> 
> Would it be possible to do it in a way so that, if amanith is available, it
> uses it, otherwise it uses png graphics?

Probably, but it will be more work. I don't see any real reason why if
amanith is packaged we shouldn't use it all the time.

> > I also had to install python-pyogg; I'm not 100% sure why, but it seems
> > sensible thing to depend on anyway (even when it does work without, it's
> > heavier on the memory usage, according to the docs).
> 
> Then we should depend on vorbis-tools too or that is not neccesary?

No need. python-pyogg depends on liboog; it doesn't need vorbis-tools.

Matt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: