On Fri May 11 17:13, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > > I have packaging for this now at > > http://mjj29.matthew.ath.cx/fretsonfire-data-sectoid.debian.tar.gz, > > which includes a get-orig-source target to create the source tarball. > > I've also updated the fretsonfire packaging in svn to depend on it. I'll > > add the sectoid packaging to svn if people agree with this approach > > I wonder if it would be better to just recommend it, instead on depending on > it. We should also create some Provides: name for all the packages including > FoF songs, i guess. I think we should depend on some songs package. A also don't think we need provides; would there be any reason _not_ to have the sectoid songs installed? I don't see any need to introduce a virtual package here for depends/provides. fretsonfire depends fretsonfire-data-sectoid fretsonfire-data-* depends fretsonfire and optionally fretsonfire (recommends/suggests) fretsonfire-data-* should be fine. > We should also include the tutorial song somewhere, don't we? I was intending this to be in the main fretsonfire package (as it is at the moment). Matt -- Matthew Johnson University of Cambridge PhD Student
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature