On Fri May 11 11:20, Matthew Johnson wrote: > In terms of packaging, we probably want to have them as a separate > source package (I think), which produces a binary package which > fretsonfire depends on. Something like fretsonfire-data-sectoid? We > could then have fretsonfire-data-inkila in non-free for the songs from > upstream. I have packaging for this now at http://mjj29.matthew.ath.cx/fretsonfire-data-sectoid.debian.tar.gz, which includes a get-orig-source target to create the source tarball. I've also updated the fretsonfire packaging in svn to depend on it. I'll add the sectoid packaging to svn if people agree with this approach Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature