Bug#354774: Django packaging
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:19:12PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Brett Parker wrote:
> > > I would strongly suggest that you start maintining this package in the
> > > python-modules subversion repository:
> > > http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/
> > >
> > > I can add you to the team if you agree. Just indicate me your Alioth
> > > login.
> >
> > I currently don't have one!
>
> http://alioth.debian.org/account/register.php
Will do that tomorrow :)
> > > Then, the first task will be to update the package to follow the new
> > > Python policy as even Brett's latest 0.95 package do not seem to be ready
> > > for release in unstable without that.
> >
> > I was looking at that this weekend, I should be able to sort the
> > packaging on tuesday/wednesday evening and have new packages available
> > then.
>
> I have created an updated package already for my need:
> http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/
Will check that out tomorrow!
> This package is compliant to the new policy. I removed the useless split
> between the media and the rest. The package is architecture all AFAICT,
> there was no good reason to split it.
The origional split was because of the different versions of python and
how old python policy worked, without the python-foo style directory,
this would have needed a seperate package as otherwise you duplicate the
admin media, which seemed a bit wasteful.
> I improved/extended the description. I added recommends of python-psycopg,
> python-sqlite and python-mysqldb. I used CDBS as it's very common within
> the Debian Python Modules Team and it simplifies a lot the work.
Cool!
> I think the package is mostly ready as is, but you're welcome to further
> enhance it and to double check everything.
I'll take a look tomorrow/wednesday - thanks for your assisstance!
--
Brett Parker
Reply to: