[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#384474: ITP: weplab -- tool designed to break WEP keys



Hi,
* =?UTF-8?Q?Adam=20C=C3=A9cile=20 =20 <gandalf@le-vert.net> [2006-08-25 00:53]:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:05:23 +0200, Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de> wrote:
> > * Adam Cécile <gandalf@le-vert.net> [2006-08-24 18:52]:
> >> * Package name    : weplab
> >>   Version         : 0.1.5
[...] 
> > I tried to build your mentors package:
> > 
> > pdebuild -rfakeroot -us -uc
> > dpkg-buildpackage: source package is weplab
> > dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.1.5-1
> > dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
> > <gandalf@le-vert.net>
> > dpkg-buildpackage: source version without epoch 0.1.5-1
> >  fakeroot debian/rules clean
> > dh_testdir
> > dh_testroot
> > rm -f build-stamp 
> > /usr/bin/make clean
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/nion/wep/weplab-0.1.5'
> > /bin/sh ./config.status --recheck
> > /bin/sh: ./config.status: No such file or directory
> > make[1]: *** [config.status] Error 127
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/nion/wep/weplab-0.1.5'
> > make: *** [clean] Error 2
[...] 
> I found this bug and I'm fixing it right now. Makefile is 
> created by configure script so I added a depedency on 
> configure.status to clean rules and use make distclean 
> instead of make clean.
> 
> I'm building it in my pbuilder to see if everything goes fine.
> 
> Btw, I have removed my current weplab package from mentors 
> to reupload a fixed release but dupload say me the package 
> is already present on mentors ftp ?!?!?
> 
> How can I reupload it ? 

I dont know if there are any special package treatments for 
mentors.debian.net (I never used it) but it should be no 
problem to build a -2 revision and upload it.
Regards Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - JAB: nion@jabber.ccc.de | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://nion.modprobe.de/blog/
Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons -
gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!

Attachment: pgpaNClARZlCs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: