Bug#250473: marked as done (ITP: srvreport -- Automatic Server Reporting System)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:08 -0600
with message-id <E1EICcO-0004Jw-00@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2004 08:23:17 +0000
>From formorer@formorer.de Sun May 23 01:23:17 2004
Return-path: <formorer@formorer.de>
Received: from ned.snow-crash.org [80.190.251.24] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BRoGL-00076e-00; Sun, 23 May 2004 01:23:17 -0700
Received: from maggie.formorer.de (pD9FFA706.dip.t-dialin.net [217.255.167.6])
by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6BDF917930; Sun, 23 May 2004 10:23:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lisa ([192.168.0.22] ident=Debian-exim)
by maggie.formorer.de with esmtp (tls_cipher TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BRoBg-0000AG-00; Sun, 23 May 2004 10:18:28 +0200
Received: from formorer by lisa with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BRoFK-0006cU-PL; Sun, 23 May 2004 10:22:14 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: srvreport -- Automatic Server Reporting System
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.59
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 10:22:14 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <E1BRoFK-0006cU-PL@lisa>
Sender: Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>
X-ned.snow-crash.org-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ned.snow-crash.org-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam,
SpamAssassin (score=2.646, required 4.8, RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK 2.55,
RCVD_IN_SORBS 0.10)
X-ned.snow-crash.org-MailScanner-SpamScore: 2
X-MailScanner-From: formorer@formorer.de
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : srvreport
Version : 0.60
Upstream Author : Jochen Kalmbach <JKalmbach@users.sourceforge.net>
* URL : http://srvreport.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Automatic Server Reporting System
SrvReport is a simple and featurefull server monitoring and reporting
system. It can send every day a mail with the latest state of the server
including:
- Network traffic report (including graph per hour)
- Web-server traffic and vhost report
- CPU usage report (including dayly graph per quater)
- Xfer-logs (ftp)
- Analyse of postfix/sendmail mail-log (to, from, size)
- Analyse of qpopper checks (username, # of checks, time)
- Last authenticated users
- Report of server warnings
- Optional test for rootkits (with chkrootkit)
- Optional may other reports (via config-file)
It supports also:
- Full localisation
- Adding of new modules
- Changing the design of the html report via css
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-rc3
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 250473-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 21:59:09 +0000
>From damog@merkel.debian.org Wed Sep 21 14:59:09 2005
Return-path: <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICcP-0004iO-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:59:09 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICcO-0004Jw-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:08 -0600
To: 250473-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <E1EICcO-0004Jw-00@merkel.debian.org>
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:08 -0600
Delivered-To: 250473-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the ITP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your ITP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 450 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the ITP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 250473
thanks bts
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
250473@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* ITPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Wed, 20 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500
Reply to: